Return to Project-GC

Welcome to Project-GC Q&A. Ask questions and get answers from other Project-GC users.

If you get a good answer, click the checkbox on the left to select it as the best answer.

Upvote answers or questions that have helped you.

If you don't get clear answers, edit your question to make it clearer.

0 votes
521 views
Obviously the counting of the caches shown at project gc is calculated wrong. On Geocaching.com I'd 7030 Caches overall (including 444 Lab Caches). Today I found 7 further Tradis, so the current count is 7037.

On project-gc the lab caches are obviously counted twice, because - with a timestamp of 30.01.2022 there is an total amount of 7474 shown ...

 Cheers
Wild Utzel
in Bug reports by Wild Utzel (140 points)

1 Answer

0 votes

Where are you seeing this number? Because if I look at your Profile Stats you have: "Wild Utzel has logged 6588 different geocaches, plus 444 lab caches, a total of 7032 unique finds", which seems to indicate that your stats updated with 2 of your 7 finds from yesterday. I'm not seeing 7474 anywhere so I don't know where you got that number?

by Pleu (50.2k points)
I still can see it on https://project-gc.com/Statistics/ProfileStats. Sadly I can't add a screenshot ...
Ah, when I change the language to US, then it is correct, but changing back to german it shows:

Wild Utzel hat 7030 verschiedene Caches geloggt,
plus 444 Labcaches, insgesamt 7474 verschiedene Funde
Interesting. I tested with a couple of different languages (including German) and I'm not seeing it. Your profile shows the totalt of 7032 for all languages I've tested. I would test with a hard refresh (ctrl + F5 on windows) to begin with. Since you're seeing it and I'm not it's likely to be a local issue.
I had a look today
It says

Wild Utzel has logged 6593 different geocaches,
plus 444 lab caches, a total of 7037 unique finds
Data from 2022-01-30

In German it said

Wild Utzel hat 6593 verschiedene Caches geloggt,
plus 444 Labcaches, insgesamt 7037 verschiedene Funde
Daten vom 2022-01-30
Yes after collecting the newest data the numbers are shown correctly
...