Difference between revisions of "Talk:Resuscitation cache"
(Reply) |
(reply) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
--[[User:4523550|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550|talk]]) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET) | --[[User:4523550|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550|talk]]) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET) | ||
:[https://project-gc.com/Statistics/LonelyCaches Lonely Caches] on PGC seems to have a different meaning - i.e. one with a high age:find ratio. A cache could have a high ratio, but have been found last week, so would not be considered a resus cache. [[User:6278087|6278087]] ([[User talk:6278087|talk]]) 19:06, 18 November 2022 (CET) | :[https://project-gc.com/Statistics/LonelyCaches Lonely Caches] on PGC seems to have a different meaning - i.e. one with a high age:find ratio. A cache could have a high ratio, but have been found last week, so would not be considered a resus cache. [[User:6278087|6278087]] ([[User talk:6278087|talk]]) 19:06, 18 November 2022 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::As I said, it uses in two ways on Project-GC and that's why it would make sense to have a wiki-article explaining that instead of just redirecting it to the British term of one of the ways it's used.--[[User:4523550|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550|talk]]) 19:14, 18 November 2022 (CET) |
Revision as of 19:14, 18 November 2022
Personally I feel it would make more sense using the lonely caches page to explain the difference between the two kinds of lonley that are relevant in Project-GC terms and actually make the resus-page redirect to "lonely cache" instead since resus/resuscitation is not an official term used by Project-GC but a local British term and this is the Project-GC wiki. Opinions? --Pleu (4523550) (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET)
- Lonely Caches on PGC seems to have a different meaning - i.e. one with a high age:find ratio. A cache could have a high ratio, but have been found last week, so would not be considered a resus cache. Optimist on the run (6278087) (talk) 19:06, 18 November 2022 (CET)
- As I said, it uses in two ways on Project-GC and that's why it would make sense to have a wiki-article explaining that instead of just redirecting it to the British term of one of the ways it's used.--Pleu (4523550) (talk) 19:14, 18 November 2022 (CET)